This post was contributed by a community member. The views expressed here are the author's own.

Politics & Government

Nearby Districts Join Barnegat in Moving BOE Elections, Scrapping Budget Vote

Central Regional and Manchester boards also voted to shift vote to November

Barnegat isn't the only area school district that jumped at the chance to .  

Central Regional and Manchester boards of education have voted to move to a November election, allowing them to forego a budget referendum as long as tax levy increases stay beneath a 2 percent cap. Like Barnegat, the two districts have had to face budget referendum failures in recent years.

, officials said the idea was being discussed. Toms River Regional is consulting , said Superintendent Frank Roselli.

Find out what's happening in Barnegat-Manahawkinwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

Based on several polls, the majority of Patch readers in Barnegat, Manchester and Toms River support moving board of education elections and forgoing the public vote on the budget. In a query on this site, 71 percent of respondents said they agreed with the move. A similar poll in Manchester showed 77 percent agreed. In Toms River, the margin was smaller – 57 percent said they would be OK with a November school election.

Central Regional, Manchester districts weigh in

Find out what's happening in Barnegat-Manahawkinwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

"We don't have to go to the towns," said longtime  member  at her board's Jan. 19 board meeting. "That was so agonizing."

"It will give us a little more flexibility," board President Keith Buscio said. "In that respect, we gain a little more control that we had in the past."

Central Regional Schools Superintendent  said that the 2012-2013 budget will be tight. Parlapanides had already begun gearing up to get the budget passed in April.

"We didn't know if this bill was going to pass or not," he said. "We've already scheduled 42 meetings with the senior communities and PTAs."

Business Administrator Kevin O'Shea said he didn't anticipate the district would go over a 2 percent increase for the budget's tax levy. That would help the district avoid repeats of last year's battles when the budget went down by 106 votes, requiring the governing bodies of all five of Central's sending towns – Berkeley, Ocean Gate, Island Heights, Seaside Heights and Seaside Park – to hammer out a tax cut all five towns could live with.

Manchester Board of Education president Donald Webster said that when it came to an election day shift, "the pros outweigh the cons," said Manchester Board of Education president Donald Webster.

Webster said that, although the board has "some reservations" with the law including how referendum votes will work and whether partisan politics could come into play, the changes should be beneficial. 

Webster said that in 1903 school board elections were legislated to be held in April to avoid the partisan politics associated with the general election. Manchester's municipal government has been nonpartisan since 1990.

Last year, as has happened in years past,  the Manchester school district's $50 million budget. A weeks-long process involving meetings between the township council and board of education led to a .

"This will be a big help for us," said Superintendent of Schools David Trethaway.

Breaking down the new school elections law

Patch's partners at NJ Spotlight shed some light on the subject of the new options for school districts when it comes to elections and budget approval. Check out their full story here.

What it is: Gov. Chris Christie signed into law a bill that would allow school districts to move their board and budget elections to November and eliminate budget votes entirely for spending that falls within the new 2 percent tax cap. While the law makes such a move optional, it is arguably the most significant change to the way New Jersey residents have voted on school taxes since such a system was first enacted in 1903. The option is effective immediately, and a spokesman of the school boards association said it expects a "good number" of districts to take it.

The lure: The big attraction is that if a district moves the vote to November, it would eliminate school votes entirely for those budgets within the cap, taking away the uncertainty that grips most budgets each year when its fate — no matter the increase or even sometimes decrease — rests on a few voters.

The exception: Even if moved to November, voters would still have a say on budgets when they exceeded the cap. Districts would have to propose that excess spending as a separate ballot question, with no ability to appeal in the case of rejection.

The trade-off: The reluctance comes in the politics of moving school board elections to the prime time of November. With state and even federal offices also on the ballot, that brings a lot more voters to the polls, addressing the notoriously low turnout of April elections. But it also could make them far more partisan, raising concern that the election would be even more political than they are. There has also been opposition from some quarters to eliminating the school budget vote for even those within cap, claiming the voters should still have a say on what is the largest piece of their tax bill.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here

The views expressed in this post are the author's own. Want to post on Patch?